Page 6 of 10

Posted: Fri Mar 13, 2009 3:30 am
by Maccy Man
if i die it will be by a enemy of the us marines.

Posted: Fri Mar 13, 2009 3:32 am
by Retlaw83
You're not emotionally or mentally stable enough to enlist, if the kids I've seen them kick back are any indication.

The only way you'd die to fire targeted at US Marines is if they decided to herd retards in front of them as human shields.

Posted: Fri Mar 13, 2009 3:33 am
by Maccy Man
no Ill do just fine.

Posted: Fri Mar 13, 2009 3:36 am
by Retlaw83
I'm glad you've accepted that you'll do fine in the retard herd. Try and stay near the back. It'll put you with the ones that limp and are in wheelchairs, but if you push one of the wheelchairs you might make it out okay.

Posted: Fri Mar 13, 2009 3:56 am
by Maccy Man
ha i see you, hows it going?

Posted: Fri Mar 13, 2009 4:54 am
by Retlaw83
I'm guessing that means you're in love with me and stalking me, if you can see me? Because I'm in a room with the computer not visible through the windows.

Posted: Fri Mar 13, 2009 4:59 am
by Maccy Man
it must be opposite day and your the one stalking me cause im at home watching tv.

Posted: Fri Mar 13, 2009 11:31 am
by Retlaw83
Maccy Man wrote:it must be opposite day and your the one stalking me cause im at home watching tv.
So I'm on TV now?

Posted: Fri Mar 13, 2009 5:24 pm
by niejadek5
Retlaw83 wrote:
Maccy Man wrote:it must be opposite day and your the one stalking me cause im at home watching tv.
So I'm on TV now?
What is the title for this porno?

Posted: Fri Mar 13, 2009 11:23 pm
by Maccy Man
its the one with all the puking japanese girls

Posted: Sat Mar 14, 2009 10:27 am
by Manoil
Pooperscooper has already viewed this page twenty times since you said that

Posted: Sat Mar 14, 2009 3:44 pm
by vx trauma
niejadek5 wrote:
Retlaw83 wrote:
Maccy Man wrote:it must be opposite day and your the one stalking me cause im at home watching tv.
So I'm on TV now?
What is the title for this porno?
'enf enf - the magick sockpuppet. from brazil. 5.'

Posted: Sun Mar 15, 2009 9:08 am
by virus16bit
Wow, thanks for the 3 or so pages of nothing but back and forth Retlaw83 and Maccy Man, I'm sure all of us here appreciate a good elementary school recess fight after battling Super Mutants and Feral Ghouls most of the night.

Now if that useless and irrelevant thread is over, Id like to list my three cents worth of criticism of Fallout 3.

1. I played it first a month or so ago, and hit straight through the Main Quest. Not too terribly difficult nor easy, but incredibly short!!! In Fallout 2 there was hours after hours of game play, and tho not required, you almost had to complete some of the side quests to level up and finish the game. In fallout 3 they went way too liberal on that. Of course, ending the game after the Project Purity scene wasn't smart either...

2. There was indeed a great amount of detail involved in creating this fallout 3 world, but there is waaaay too much "dead stuff" in there! Many objects untouchable, cars / busses seemingly un-enterable, buildings that look easily enterable (shattered windows) work like walls. How many doors can't be opened? Block them off then!

3. Finally, I understand there is only going to be 3 DLCs for this game. If Bethesda wishes continued success in the Fallout arena like Interplay did, then they had better re-consider that decision. The add-ons are very cool, but they don't substitute for an expansion pack as far as time goes.

Thats all.

Oh, and Retlaw83, you are an idiot. I sincerely hope you get booted off this site for how obscene and rude you have been. It baffles me to no end how people like you are allowed to function in a civilized world.

Posted: Sun Mar 15, 2009 9:25 am
by Psychoul
virus16bit wrote:1. I played it first a month or so ago, and hit straight through the Main Quest. Not too terribly difficult nor easy, but incredibly short!!! In Fallout 2 there was hours after hours of game play, and tho not required, you almost had to complete some of the side quests to level up and finish the game. In fallout 3 they went way too liberal on that. Of course, ending the game after the Project Purity scene wasn't smart either...

2. There was indeed a great amount of detail involved in creating this fallout 3 world, but there is waaaay too much "dead stuff" in there! Many objects untouchable, cars / busses seemingly un-enterable, buildings that look easily enterable (shattered windows) work like walls. How many doors can't be opened? Block them off then!

3. Finally, I understand there is only going to be 3 DLCs for this game. If Bethesda wishes continued success in the Fallout arena like Interplay did, then they had better re-consider that decision. The add-ons are very cool, but they don't substitute for an expansion pack as far as time goes.
I agree, especially on the first paragraph. And when i tried to climb the wreckage surrounding DC, i was confronted with the invisible, yet imminent, wall of death. I mean, i could have made it over if that stupid thing wasnt there.. SHIT!!, i wanted to be like the vault dweller and that chick were when standing ontop of the ruins when installing fallout 1.. not really, i jsut thought of that and that is how it would have looked like, but i didnt actually think of them while tring to climb the ruins. There are a lot of invisible walls though.

btw, DAC = a civilized world?
and some one needs to write a review about "the obama deception"

Posted: Sun Mar 15, 2009 9:32 am
by virus16bit
You know what I mean :joy: For a real-world experience I don't seem to remember running into invisible walls outside my house, so why would they do so in the game?

Perhaps they didn't have time, but then again when they push addons and patches they can add the missing art to make it more fun for all to play.

I might be wrong about the civilized world, but the Obama deception?
The country and the news does not agree with you my man.

Posted: Sun Mar 15, 2009 9:53 am
by Wolfman Walt
So wait....Retlaw deserves the boot, but the moron doesn't?

Posted: Sun Mar 15, 2009 9:58 am
by virus16bit
And what "moron" are you referring to? If you are referring to Maccy Man, then I supose he does, tho he wasn't nearly as vulgar and rude as Retlaw83.

Otherwise I don't know who you are talking about.

Certainly not Obama, he sure as hell isn't a moron.

Posted: Sun Mar 15, 2009 10:35 am
by Wolfman Walt
Ok, you're new here. One thing you may have missed - we're all pretty vulgar, but I think you're missing why he's vulgar to the resident moron. Look at this section of the forum and you'll discover Maccy Man has commented about 5 million times on threads that are like 3 years old and hadn't seen a response and is just generally a moron.

He's someone's alt ment to troll and get under people's skin. He's ment to be talked to like that.

Also - agreed with your criticisms.

Posted: Sun Mar 15, 2009 3:11 pm
by SenisterDenister
This might be Maccy Man's wised up alt, guys. Notice he failed to criticize the prick for actually starting the whole damn thing to get Relaw so riled up in the first place.

Posted: Sun Mar 15, 2009 3:45 pm
by VasikkA
I am, in fact, Maccy Man's alt. :rolleyes: