ur stupid sigs >:(

Megatron · Post by **Megatron** » Sat Jan 15, 2005 3:35 pm

hey aDMIns

how about you have text sigs like evryone else instead of sean connery and the queen eh? ther horble

sincerely

the entire dac community, except you

Blargh · Post by **Blargh** » Sat Jan 15, 2005 3:51 pm

Bah, just abolish the bloody things altogether. They're wasteful. So wasteful.

Or,

I've got them all blocked, and consequently have no winged fucks to spare.

The latter. Yes. Or both !

Nicolai · Post by **Nicolai** » Sat Jan 15, 2005 4:02 pm

I concur.

Dan · Post by **Dan** » Sat Jan 15, 2005 4:52 pm

Nah, keep the sigs, but sig pictures, when they are so big, are annoying.

S4ur0n27 · Post by **S4ur0n27** » Sat Jan 15, 2005 5:00 pm

No pictures in sig would be good.

Post by **King of Creation** » Sat Jan 15, 2005 5:01 pm

Meg, your avatar is bigger than the picture in my sig.

Spazmo · Post by **Spazmo** » Sat Jan 15, 2005 5:03 pm

...no, I'd say your 300x180 is a bit larger than Megatron's 100x115. In the sense that it's bigger. In size. Or surface area. And volume, if they had any. 'n stuff.

Post by **King of Creation** » Sat Jan 15, 2005 5:50 pm

17.61 KB vs. 13.89 KB

Other than that, it doesn't matter. None of the sig pictures on this forum mess up the page in any way, and none even come close.

People can put whatever they want in their signatures as long as it's not wasteland material, too large for the page, or huge in file size.

Mr. Teatime · Post by **Mr. Teatime** » Sat Jan 15, 2005 5:59 pm

I agree with King, it's a non-issue really.

Post by **DarkUnderlord** » Wed Jan 19, 2005 6:24 am

I like my cow and barely legible writing.