Page 2 of 2

Posted: Sat May 14, 2005 2:13 am
by St. Toxic
Yeah, t'was completely worthless.
They pumped Arthur full of character ( he didn't need it ),
gave him a love story,
made the rest of the cast into planks of wood
and tried squeezing a million things into an hour of film.

I'd rather have a continuation of the BBC thing,
at least that felt spot on.

The guide animations were 'good enough'.

Posted: Mon May 30, 2005 2:44 am
by Lazarus Plus
It really really annoyed me how much they ignored or changed. Not to mention that they completely altered the end of the first book and gave them a goal that was pointless.

Posted: Thu Jun 02, 2005 5:23 am
by Dr. Crispy
Crap. The movie was crap.

I think I'll reread the book again, though.